Skip to content
The Berean Life

Module 2 · Lesson 4

Where Did I Get This?

Tradition, philosophy and the beliefs we inherit.

12 minutes

43 lessons · saved on this device

Study contents and search
Key verse

“Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.” (Mark 7:13)

In this lesson you will
  1. Ask the one question we rarely ask about our own beliefs
  2. Learn why sincerity and inheritance are not tests of truth
  3. See how an outside framework can quietly take control of the text
  4. Learn why a system that explains everything is not thereby true
  5. Apply the same standard to every view, including your own

Start with a question Think of something you believe about God. How did you come to believe it? Was it from reading a verse, or from hearing it, year after year, from people you trusted? Most of us can’t say. We simply grew up inside it.

The test of inheritance The Bible asks the question directly. Jeremiah speaks of a day when the nations will say: “Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.” (Jeremiah 16:19)

Jesus confronted the leaders of His day for the exact same reason: “Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition... Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.” (Mark 7:9, 13)

Peter reminded believers that they were redeemed “from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers” (1 Peter 1:18).

Now look at Paul describing his own past: “And profited in the Jews’ religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.” (Galatians 1:14)

Paul was sincere, educated and zealous, and he was persecuting the church. Sincerity and inheritance are not tests of truth. What is inherited is not thereby verified.

Pause and think
  1. If Paul could be sincerely wrong about something he had received from his fathers, could I?
  2. What would I need in order to find out?

Five questions for any belief Pick a belief you hold and ask:

  1. Where did I get it? From a text, or from someone’s explanation of a text?
  2. Which verse says it? Can I point to it?
  3. Does the verse say that, or does the explanation say that?
  4. What does the surrounding passage say?
  5. Would I accept this level of evidence for a belief I didn’t hold?

That last question is the hardest, and the most honest.

When a framework takes over Sometimes it isn’t a person’s tradition that controls how we read. It is a framework: a way of thinking, a definition, a system that came from somewhere other than the page.

Paul saw the danger: “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” (Colossians 2:8)

Notice what Paul is and isn’t saying. He is not telling us to stop thinking. Thinking is necessary every time we compare, weigh or explain. His concern is that something other than Christ should not become the authority over us. The question is whether our reasoning serves the text or rules over it.

Here is how a framework can take over without anyone intending it:

  1. A reader begins with a definition that was accepted long ago.
  2. A verse appears that doesn’t fit comfortably with it.
  3. Instead of testing the definition, the reader adjusts the verse.
  4. The next difficult verse gets the same treatment.
  5. After a while, an elaborate system makes everything seem consistent.

But consistency inside a system doesn’t prove the system is true. A system can be perfectly coherent and rest on a mistaken first step. If it can explain away every difficulty, that may only show it is flexible enough to absorb anything.

So we ask:

  1. Where did the controlling definition come from?
  2. Does Scripture establish it?
  3. If the framework and the text appear to conflict, why does the framework win?
Principle

An explanation of Scripture must never be allowed to carry more authority than the Scripture it claims to explain.

A fairness rule This applies to everyone, in every direction.

  1. A teaching isn’t true because it is old, popular, or held by most Christians.
  2. A teaching isn’t false because it challenges the majority. A minority view may be right, but being a minority proves nothing.
  3. Tracing where a doctrine came from can be interesting, but it does not settle whether it is biblical. The text settles that.

Someone who leaves one inherited framework and adopts another can make exactly the same mistake in reverse. Rejecting a conclusion doesn’t free us from the assumptions that produced it, unless we examine those just as carefully.

That is why every view in this course, including the one this course leads to, will be held to the same standard.

Not a rejection of reason Don’t take this as “never think” or “never learn from others.” Paul told the Corinthians his preaching did not rest on human wisdom but on the power of God (1 Corinthians 2:4–5). That doesn’t mean learning, history and reasoning are worthless. It means they can’t replace the truth God has revealed. We use reason to examine the evidence, never to excuse ourselves from examining it.

And we do learn from others. The Bereans did. They “received the word with all readiness of mind,” and then “searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so” (Acts 17:11). They listened and they checked.

What we’ve established
  1. Beliefs we inherited have not thereby been verified (Jeremiah 16:19; Galatians 1:14).
  2. Sincerity is not a test of truth. Paul was sincere and wrong.
  3. A framework can quietly control how we read a text.
  4. A system that explains every difficulty is not thereby proved.
  5. Age, popularity and minority status all prove nothing. The same standard applies to every view.
Reflect
Journal questions
  1. Choose one belief about God. Run it through the five questions.
  2. Is there something I believe mainly because of who taught me?
  3. Would I accept the same level of evidence from a view I disagree with?
Memory verse

Acts 17:11

Notes are saved only in this browser. They are not sent anywhere.

Once we agree the text must lead, how do we actually read it so that it does?